Preloader logo

Comments

And the best waste performing country in Europe is… Estonia!

by Joan Marc Simon

According to Eurostat statistics published last week the best performing countries in Europe when it comes to waste avoidance and recycling are Estonia, Slovenia and Belgium.

Image module
seppo.net

Indeed, there are countries such as Germany who do very well in recycling (65%) but generate lots of waste (611kg). Then there are those who don’t generate much waste (324kg) but don’t recycle much such as Slovakia (13% recycling).

If one looks at how much waste is sent to landfill or incineration after recycling, it is possible to get an idea of the waste management performance of that country. (See the red column in the table at the bottom)

Estonia, Slovenia and Belgium combine a low level of municipal waste generation with an acceptable level of recycling and composting, which make them the countries that send less kg. per person to landfills and incinerators.

Estonia, the best EU performer, generates 279kg per person, and recycles 40% of it leaving 167kg to be disposed of.

That is less than 0,5kg per person per day. 2 times less than a Dane, 3 times less than a Greek and 4 times less than a Maltese…

For sake of reference, Zero Waste municipalities are a living proof that it is possible to reduce the best European benchmark more than three times the Estonian size. For instance, in Contarina district, the annual residual waste is of 57kg (that is 0,15kg per day!).

These statistics are published annually and reflect how many kg. of municipal solid waste Europeans produce and how it is treated. In average every European generated 492kg per person, recycled 42% and landfilled or incinerated 58%. A slight progress from 2011, when waste generation was 503kg (11kg more than 2012) and a 2% shift from disposal into recycling.

Eurostat 2012 + residual waste

“Lies, damned lies and statistics”, Mark Twain once said

All statistics need to be taken with a pinch of salt and particularly those that benchmark waste treatment in the EU.

Firstly because the information is provided by the environment ministries from the EU capitals without much capacity from the European Commission to double-check its consistency.

Secondly because there is not yet a single homogeneous method to calculate what is recycled, composted or landfilled or what waste is included as municipal solid waste. For instance, waste exports and backfilling are considered recycling in some countries but not in all of EU. Or some countries such as France allow the output from MBT plants to be called compost when this is forbidden in others.

Finally, caution is required because the differentiation between the treatment categories is not useful to understand where the waste actually ends up. For example, incineration is a pre-treatment operation because after the combustion it will still have a residue of 20 to 30% of toxic ashes that need to be landfilled, yet they don’t appear in the landfill column.

This explains that countries such as Germany show zero landfill rates when in reality it they are landfilling more than the French (30 million tones for the former vs 24 for the latter). What the “0” landfill means is that no waste is landfilled without pre-treatment…

All in all, although one must acknowledge that the Eurostat manages to present the most homogeneous supranational data on waste treatment in the world, the degree of heterogeneity should be taken into account for the comparisons.

In the meantime what data so far does show is that the borders between Western and Eastern Europe have fallen when it comes to waste management. As a whole, old EU member states such as Spain or France perform significantly worst in recycling than new member states such as Estonia or Slovenia.

At the same time whereas traditional “advanced” member states such as Sweden, Denmark or Germany are stuck in the incineration trap, we might be seeing new waste champions arising in those places where there is flexibility to continue reducing waste generation and increasing recycling.

Estonia, the best EU performer, generates 279kg per person, and recycles 40% of it leaving 167kg to be disposed of.

Want to read more?

Here are a few related posts...
There are 14 comments
  1. Ofc . In Romania the enviroment authorities are very very slow. Just started my waste broker business and 5 months have passed to get the ok for doing business because i couldnt get a straight answer…

  2. Public should be encouraged to take better care.

  3. […] big (negative) surprise was Estonia, the European waste champion of 2012 managed to keep low waste generation rates but because of building an expensive incinerator it has […]

  4. […] more than most countries in Europe. Estonia are the most frugal and clean country on balance: http://www.zerowasteeurope.eu/20…Embed QuoteWritten 3m ago. 3 views.Upvote1DownvoteComment Loading… Write an answerRelated […]

  5. […] fact of the matter is, Finland is no model-country when it comes to recycling. In 2012, only 34% of Finnish waste was recycled, while 33% ended up at the dump site. That’s pretty […]

  6. […] instance, in any given year, only 40% of the garbage in Europe is recycled. In Germany, almost one-third of the household appliances consumers disposed of in 2012 were still […]

  7. […] instance, in any given year, only 40% of the garbage in Europe is recycled. In Germany, almost one-third of the household appliances consumers disposed of in 2012 were still […]

  8. […] mahtuda oma prügihulgaga ikkagi sellesse 80 liitrisesse konteinerisse ära. Kuigi üldiselt on eestlased tublid prügimajandajad, siis vaadates prügi koguseid, mida üks eestlane keskmiselt aastas toodab, on ikkagi tunne, et […]

  9. There seems to be big room for improvement in the UK. Hard to believe that one of the richest countries performs worse than the poorest. We need to lobby our government a bit more to get the message heard.

  10. […] source: http://www.zerowasteeurope.eu/2014/04/and-the-best-waste-performing-country-in-europe-is-estonia/ note that this website has some interesting things to say about the nature of these statistics […]

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Error: Please enter a valid email address

Error: Invalid email

Error: Please enter your first name

Error: Please enter your last name

Error: Please enter a username

Error: Please enter a password

Error: Please confirm your password

Error: Password and password confirmation do not match